WikiSWOT
  • Home|
  • About Us|
  • How it Works|
  • Free SWOTs|
  • What's a SWOT?|
  • FAQ|
User Generated >> CLABSI Prevention SWOT Analysis:
Strengths
  • Products accessible - CVC insertion kit Arrowgard BLUE, Chloraprep, BioPatch
  • Current references available - CDC HICPAC, INS, SHEA, IHI
  • Monitoring already in place (insertion checklist)
  • Monitoring shows compliance with max barrier precautions
  • CLABSI already on the Board of Trustees dashboard
  • Nurse education (orientation and annually) already in place
Weaknesses
  • Lack of compliance with port disinfection prior to entering IV lines
  • Doentation is fragmented
  • Lack of line labeling
  • Staff are not using BioPatch appropriately (placement)
  • Lack of proactive effort to remove CVL (attempt PIV prior to dc)
Opportunities
  • Doentation needs to be standardized (Meditech & McKesson)
  • - minimize the number of places (screens, interventions) nurses doent
  • Need accurate doentation of IV tubing and dressing changes
  • Empower nurses to STOP the LINE if best practices are not met
  • Need increased attention on removing non-essential tubes (incl. CVL)
  • Need compliance with Scrub the Hub prior to accessing ports, end caps
Threats
  • External changes (government, politics, taxes, etc)
  • Staffing - case mix - nurses may not have time to change dressings, tubings
  • Standard practice is to leave the line in until discharge
  • Financial - no reimburt for HAC like CLABSI
  • Financial - Hub disinfection (Effect-IV for example) additional expense

History: Version 1 (Newest)



Go back to the SWOT analysis index, or start a discussion about CLABSI Prevention SWOT analysis by adding a comment below WikiSWOT Comments



 
Name
Email (not shared)
Website

Add comment